MedReadr: Pioneering Health Information Validation for the Medical Technology Ecosystem


By Bilal Chughtai, Chief of Urology, Northwell Health

As the medical technology continuously evolves, so does the need for trustworthy, accessible health information. Here, we introduce MedReadr, which assesses the reliability of digital health content, allowing healthcare facilities to integrate this tool into their ecosystem seamlessly. The tool analyzes the text and metadata (information on and about the webpage) to give articles a reliability score based on various factors like the current information, the number of scientific references, overall sentiment, and use of key-phrases associated with content reliability. This tool bridges the gap for credible medical information, supporting both patients and providers in their decision-making processes.

Navigating the Growing Need for Reliable Health Information

The rapid expansion of digital health resources offers a vast array of information, but not all of it is reliable. This is particularly concerning as online information plays a pivotal role in health decisions, with over 80% of patients turning to the internet to research health concerns1. MedReadr, developed by our group, addresses this pressing need by offering an automatic tool for the validation of online health content. When a user activates MedReadr on a webpage, it examines the article’s content for specific indicators of reliability. These include the presence of publication dates, references to scientific literature, and mentions of healthcare providers. Additionally, it looks for language that might indicate endorsement or uncertainty regarding medical treatments. More specifically, MedReadr scans the article’s text and metadata for key attributes. For example, the algorithm employs regular expressions to detect date formats in the text and searches for specific tags in the metadata that indicate publication date and references. It also searches for references to scientific literature, such as DOIs, to score the article’s reference quality. MedReadr also counts specific phrases related to patient quality-of-life, doctor-patient relationship, and mechanisms of treatment, which have been shown to correlate with article reliability. MedReadr uses advanced algorithms to provide a quantitative evaluation of health information. It focuses on key factors such as currency, references, sentiment, and credibility. MedReadr uses text and metadata analysis to generate a quantitative reliability score, addressing the limitations of traditional validation methods such as QUEST and DISCERN and the labor-intensive nature of manually scored content validation methods, which are dependent on health literacy.2,3.

Addressing Challenges in Consumer Medical Information Validation

The healthcare sector faces numerous challenges when it comes to adopting new technologies, especially in areas like digital content validation. Traditional tools often rely on expert input, which can be both time-consuming and resource intensive. MedReadr offers a solution by simplifying this process, enabling rapid assessment of vast quantities of online content.

However, developing and deploying MedReadr is not without its own set of challenges. One of the primary difficulties was ensuring the tool’s accuracy across diverse medical topics and content types. With online health information ranging from reputable medical journals to personal blogs and commercially driven websites, it was essential for MedReadr to distinguish between these varying sources effectively. This was achieved through extensive validation against well-known manual scoring systems, namely the QUEST algorithm, which assesses factors like authorship, attribution, and tone. By using these benchmarks, MedReadr was calibrated to ensure a high degree of accuracy and reliability.

While MedReadr can provide a quick assessment, users might place too much trust in its scores, viewing them as definitive markers of reliability without considering the nuances of each article. MedReadr is a powerful tool, but it is not a substitute for clinical judgment. Recognizing this, the development team has emphasized the importance of using MedReadr as a supplementary tool rather than a primary decision-making resource.

In conclusion, MedReadr represents a significant step toward a more connected, informed, and resilient healthcare ecosystem by providing a quick, reliable way to assess online health content.

The Impact of MedReadr on Healthcare

Adopting MedReadr offers numerous advantages for healthcare providers, patients, and the broader healthcare ecosystem. For providers, MedReadr facilitates the rapid vetting of online health resources, enabling them to guide patients toward credible sources with confidence. This, in turn, fosters better communication between patients and providers, as patients can bring well-informed questions and concerns to their appointments, enhancing the overall quality of care.

Patients also benefit from MedReadr’s accessibility. The tool empowers them to make informed decisions about their health by distinguishing between reliable and unreliable information. This can potentially reduce the risks associated with self-diagnosis based on inaccurate information, a common issue in today’s digital age.

From an industry perspective, MedReadr showcases how AI can support the healthcare ecosystem by automating manual processes. This improves efficiency but also allows for scalability, enabling healthcare facilities to monitor and validate health content on a much larger scale than previously possible. The tool’s integration into the healthcare ecosystem reflects the ongoing digital transformation in medical technology, where automation and AI are playing increasingly central roles.

MedReadr’s algorithm currently focuses on text-based content and is not equipped to analyze multimedia information, such as videos or podcasts. As digital health resources continue to diversify, expanding MedReadr’s capabilities to include these media formats will be an essential step in ensuring it remains a comprehensive tool for health information validation.

Supporting a Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Sharing Ecosystem

MedReadr aligns with the unique peer-to-peer learning approach that MedicalTech Magazine advocates. The tool fosters a shared understanding of digital health information validation among medical professionals, facilitating collaboration and knowledge sharing within the healthcare community. By providing a reliable way to assess the credibility of online health information, MedReadr helps build a foundation for informed discussions between providers, patients, and peers.

Healthcare providers can use MedReadr to ensure they are sharing validated information with patients, which can lead to more productive conversations about health concerns. Furthermore, the tool supports a collaborative environment where providers can learn from each other’s experiences with digital health resources.

Future Directions for MedReadr and Medical Technology

As medical technology continues to advance, tools like MedReadr exemplify the potential to tackle emerging challenges in design, validation, and regulation. The healthcare sector is becoming increasingly reliant on AI to enhance operational efficiency and improve patient outcomes. MedReadr is a prime example of how AI can be leveraged to address specific challenges in the industry, setting the stage for future innovations in digital health.

Looking ahead, the development team plans to expand MedReadr’s capabilities by incorporating multimedia content analysis, enabling it to assess videos, podcasts, and other non-textual resources. This will be a critical advancement as digital health resources increasingly diversify beyond traditional text-based articles. Furthermore, by incorporating user feedback, MedReadr can continue to evolve and adapt to the changing landscape of digital health information.

MedReadr’s journey highlights both the promise and the challenges of integrating AI into healthcare. While technological tools can significantly enhance accessibility and efficiency, they must be designed and validated carefully to ensure they provide accurate, reliable, and ethical support to users. As MedReadr continues to develop, it will be exciting to see how it contributes to broader efforts to improve online health literacy and empower users in a digital age.

In conclusion, MedReadr represents a significant step toward a more connected, informed, and resilient healthcare ecosystem by providing a quick, reliable way to assess online health content. As the medical technology industry continues to evolve, tools like MedReadr underscore the potential of technology to enhance care quality, improve operational efficiency, and ultimately contribute to better health outcomes.

Joshua Winograd1, Autumn Kim2, Nikit Venishetty3, Alia Codelia-Anjum4, Dean Elterman MD5, Naeem Bhojani MD6, Kevin C. Zorn MDCM6,7, Adithya Balasubramanian MD8, Bilal Chughtai MD4

1Joan and Sandord I. Weill Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
2Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis Missouri
3Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas
4Department of Urology, Northwell Health, Plainview, New York
5Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
6Division of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
7BPH Canada Prostate Institute, Mont-Royal Surgical Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
8Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York